|
|||||||||||
|
RE: Identifying Win2K/XP Encrypted Files
From: Dante Mercurio <dmercurio(at)ccgsecurity.com>
Date: Thu Jan 30 2003 - 09:39:01 EST Anyone have any recommendations in that regard? Would a better policy be to poke a little? What about information in active memory?
M. Dante Mercurio
-----Original Message-----
As a general rule of thumb, as long as it's not a *nix box, or an NT or Win2K server, you're usually fine to pull the plug (emphasis on the "usually" - if you do it and all goes wrong don't blame me!!!)
Craig G Earnshaw
>>I would actually suggest a different method. If you are tasked to
>>subsequently be used to suggest that you have tampered with the
>Obviously it's better than shutting the box down as something may be
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com Received on Thu Jan 30 09:33:33 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:01:43 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||