|
|||||||||||
|
Re: MD5 Exploit Database?
From: Bruce P. Burrell <bpb(at)umich.edu>
Date: Wed Feb 05 2003 - 15:40:56 EST
> In essence what is needed is sone kind of reliable signature as used by
Or not so slightly. > but still retains an identifyable bit pattern.
Sad to say, this is not always so: some viruses are extremely polymorphic, and their maps require algorithmic techniques. > Maybe some infpor on the guys in AV labs on how to best look for this?
Hey, why not just use an antivirus scanner on the image? I'd recommend using a "paranoid" scan, though, so that nothing it _can_ recognize is missed. [One can use grep to get rid of the false positives, at least with the scanner I use.] Moreover, it's easy to keep these tools updated... in other words, no extra effort need be expended by *us*. :-) [I really doubt that the AV folks are going to make the details of their scanner algorithms -- after all, that's their bread and butter. And using Open AntiVirus doesn't really solve the problem -- that detects only about 17% of the known malware out there, as I recall. [Of course, the 17% it *does* detect probably is more likely to be viruses one would expect to see -- but viruses aren't the main concern, I suspect: it's the OTHER malware that concerns us here.] > Failing that, it shouldnt be too difficult to concoct a tool that can
In other words, use well chosen heuristics. Yes, indeed, but it's better to use that only after exact identification has been used by a current, top quality scanner. -BPB
University of Michigan...
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com Received on Thu Feb 6 14:29:40 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:01:43 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||