|
|||||||||||
|
The "unplug the cord" dilemma
From: Omar Herrera <oherrera(at)prodigy.net.mx>
Date: Thu Mar 27 2003 - 09:34:35 EST ('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is) I was looking for documentation available discussing circumstances where each of the following approaches is better: offline forensics It can be argued that with any of these approaches you potentially loose or alter evidence in some way; usually, approach c) is considered best in procedures as it freezes the hard disk and makes impossible further tampering (network connection information and data in volatile memory not written to disk would be lost however). Approach a) is sometimes necessary , for example, if there is an incident with a mission critical system that cannot be unplugged from the network or shut down (even if backups are available, sometimes bringing up a replacement system might take just too long or be extremely difficult because of specialized hardware availability). I intend to write a paper on the matter including a list of situations where each approach is better suited but I want to include as well legal implications for each approach (legal requirements from different countries are welcome) and also recommended procedures for each approach (for example, in an online investigation you might still use trusted binaries saved on a floppy or cdrom rather than system binaries; if the kernel was tampered with this might be of no use though). All feedback, comments and suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Regards, Omar Herrera This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com Received on Sat Mar 29 08:33:55 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:01:43 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||