Re: The "unplug the cord" dilemma
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 07:47:57 CST, Omar Herrera <oherrera@prodigy.net.mx> said:
> If taking decision C, could the company argue that by isolating the
A case could be made that if that machine wasn't *already* both isolated
and provided with a high-availability hot-fallover spare, that the company
wasn't being very diligent.
Of course, we're talking the FAA here, the same bunch that was still running
IBM 3083s in production as Y2K approached (the 308x series was produced
in the 1982-1988 timeframe, so we're talking 12-18 year old mainframes).
At least those got replaced quicker than the IBM9020's THEY replaced...
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Tue Apr 1 22:08:10 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8
: Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:01:43 EDT
|