RE: RPAT - Realtime Proxy Abuse Triangulation

From: Rob Shein <shoten(at)starpower.net>
Date: Mon Dec 30 2002 - 12:45:20 EST

This is fundamentally flawed logic. To cite a physical-world equivalent, just because a door isn't locked doesn't make entering it against the wishes of the occupant anything other than breaking and entering, plus unlawful entry if you have illegal intent upon entering. The law does not recognize that failure to properly defend against criminal behavior means that you surrender all the protective means afforded by the criminal justice system.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary Flynn [mailto:flynngn@jmu.edu]
> Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 9:47 AM
> To: Mathias Wegner
> Cc: Kurt Seifried; Stephen Friedl; incidents@securityfocus.com
> Subject: Re: RPAT - Realtime Proxy Abuse Triangulation
>
>
> Mathias Wegner wrote:

---

This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com Received on Mon Dec 30 15:23:01 2002