|
|||||||||||
|
Fwd: Re: Packets from 255.255.255.255(80) (was: Packet from port 80 with spoofed microsoft.com ip)
From: Dave Laird <dlaird(at)kharma.net>
Date: Fri Jan 31 2003 - 15:57:00 EST
Good morning, everyone...
Subject: Re: Packets from 255.255.255.255(80) (was: Packet from port 80 with
spoofed microsoft.com ip)
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 07:03, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
We are also seeing these, tcp flags are RST+ACK seq number and window size both zero and varying Ack and ttl. Not all addresses in our net are being hit, in one /24 I checked only two addresses have been probed. While I do not claim that what I am about to suggest has any bearing on similar incidents taking place, yesterday and the day before I saw a huge number of these packets on a DSL-attached network. Here is one sample: [pardon the line wrap] Jan 30 07:14:54 home kernel: Bad packet rejected=eth1 OUT= MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:30:66:00:35:49:08:00 SRC=000.000.000.000 DST=255.255.255.255 LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=60 ID=47753 PROTO=TCP SPT=28149 DPT=80 WINDOW=0 RES=0x00 RST URGP=0 Some things I noticed right off:
Someone told me this morning that this may be an unpatched XP workstation running MS-Access, which seemed pretty odd, too. However, then I read up on the MSDE and it does seem possible. Thoughts, anyone?
Dave
An automatic & random thought For the Minute:
Murphy's Law is recursive. Washing your car to make it rain doesn't work.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQE+OuMdaE1ENZP1A28RAoRLAJ4uRr/hWC3gYo2hY1kgPxA4N4KgMgCfVJzk
ZVc9EW7JBpNyZ+RKEAmRDr8=
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com Received on Sun Feb 2 11:33:09 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:01:57 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||