|
|||||||||||
|
Re: [Snort-sigs] Snort Signatures for LSD-PL.NET Exploit
From: Martin Roesch <roesch(at)sourcefire.com>
Date: Fri Mar 14 2003 - 00:02:59 EST
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 12:32 AM, Loki wrote: > One thing to mention, the exploit wouldn't have triggered any of the
Sid numbering:
0-100: Reserved for Marty
> Your confusion as to why the official snort rules using depth and mine
There's a big difference between using the depth/offset options properly and incorrectly. When used properly (which usually requires an intimate knowledge of the protocol you're analyzing) it works very well, people who are inexperienced with Snort and network protocol analysis should think twice about using these options. -Marty
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQE+cWKLqj0FAQQ3KOARAqQTAJ9fDUgq8j+T5w/lxE1HCeNxp5xHmwCfXFNf
3GbNE3YsqnyW+aVxOUnrXr4=
<Pre>Lose another weekend managing your IDS?
Take back your personal time.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:02:00 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||