|
|||||||||||
|
RE: cisco 7200 performance issue
From: Luciano Z <user_luciano(at)yahoo.com.br>
Date: Fri May 23 2003 - 15:42:14 EDT
I forgot the version information :-)
Another interesting information is that the router does not use SSH, it is connected to a console server. This is configuration is not a regular policy, I still have boxes that use telnet :-(
Follow-up on this incident:
Some of the replys I got recommended this to but let´s analyze the problem of implementing access-lists on this box. This is a access layer box so we have about 80 active customers connected to this router. If we apply an access-list to protect the router by droping all packets destinated to the router´s interface (and it´s loopbacks) we will end up with an access-list with at least 80 lines (imagine the problem to manage this while activating/deactivating customers). So this is not a solution, at least at this network layer. One thing we did here after the incident is a review of the "schedule allocate" configuration. We first used the values on that classic paper about router securiy wrote by cisco but now we change it a bit and will test this to evalute this new value.
Well, thanks for all the replys I got.
[]
Yahoo! Mail O melhor e-mail gratuito da internet: 6MB de espaço, antivírus, acesso POP3, filtro contra spam. http://br.mail.yahoo.com/
To get your FREE white paper visit us at: http://www.securityfocus.com/AirDefense-incidents Received on Mon May 26 12:09:42 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:02:06 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||