Hosting Provided By

RE: Command Line RPC vulnerability scanner?

From: Schmehl, Paul L <pauls(at)utdallas.edu>
Date: Thu Jul 31 2003 - 11:30:31 EDT

I have both eEye's tool and ISS's tool. I decided to run the ISS commandline scanner on our entire class B last night. That way I could come in this morning and have a complete report of patch compliance. Or so I thought. When I got in to my office this morning, the ISS tool had been running for 15 hours and had reported on a total of 99 hosts.

I don't know what's wrong with it, but something obviously is.

Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Wright [mailto:mcwright@dbls.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 1:25 PM
> To: JAMIE CRAWFORD; incidents@securityfocus.com
> Subject: Re: Command Line RPC vulnerability scanner?
>
>
> Yes. ISS provides one for windows:

Received on Thu Jul 31 12:16:25 2003

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Joe Matusiewicz: "Re: Scans for 17300/tcp starting again"
Previous message: Sam Baskinger: "Re: Command Line RPC vulnerability scanner?"
Maybe in reply to: JAMIE CRAWFORD: "Command Line RPC vulnerability scanner?"
In reply to Michael Wright: "Re: Command Line RPC vulnerability scanner?"
Next in thread: Christopher Cramer: "RE: Command Line RPC vulnerability scanner?"
Reply: Christopher Cramer: "RE: Command Line RPC vulnerability scanner?"
Reply: Russell Fulton: "RE: Command Line RPC vulnerability scanner?"
Reply: Paul Tinsley: "RE: Command Line RPC vulnerability scanner?"
Reply: Brad Bemis: "RE: Command Line RPC vulnerability scanner?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:02:14 EDT