Re: [PATCH] make install should install libnet-config

Jeff Nathan wrote:
> I don't think it's too late to simply produce a library archive/shared

That's the same conclusion I came to tonight. The next release of libnet should probably be libnet2.0 (or libnet2-2.0). The include file should be libnet2.h, etc, etc. And -- just because to do otherwise would confuse people -- we would mercifully let the config script live on, as libnet2-config.

We would want to submit patches to fix the major apps out there that have already moved to libnet-1.1, as a way of apologizing for getting the naming wrong the first time.

Does that sound like a plan? I guess the author of libnet is the guy to convince, or?

• Dan

-- 
Dan Kegel
http://www.kegel.comhttp://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: libnet-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com
For additional commands, e-mail: libnet-help@securityfocus.com