Re: [RFC] Renaming libnet-1.1.1 to libnet2-1.1.1

On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Dan Kegel wrote:

:Aaron Turner wrote:

This is probably a lame question -- but if there was such a major API change, shouldn't it have been libnet 2.0 instead of libnet 1.1? Was there some reason it should be 1.1 and not the other?

I know that this is in the past, but Im curious for the actual reason.

Cheers,
Andrew

--
Andrew R. Reiter
arr@watson.org
arr@FreeBSD.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: libnet-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com
For additional commands, e-mail: libnet-help@securityfocus.com