Re: [RFC] Renaming libnet-1.1.1 to libnet2-1.1.1

From: Jeff Nathan <jeff(at)snort.org>
Date: Thu Mar 06 2003 - 15:13:14 EST

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Dan,

I don't think it's up to me (or anyone other than the author to decide for that matter), but since you asked, I would prefer libnet-1.1 be renamed to libnet-2 to ease the transition on systems with applications that support a mix of the two libraries. In the end I think it would encourage development using the new library as well.

• -Jeff
• -- http://www.snort.org/~jeff (pgp key available) "Perhaps the greatest responsibility in promoting peace is that of protecting it."
• - Me

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (OpenBSD)

iD8DBQE+Z6vdEqr8+Gkj0/0RAq21AJ9tQ3VhgvSylZqNu1uz51R1WOum4wCeISYk PgEMpCQOZHd0BBcNU4yUJR8=
=2hmk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---

To unsubscribe, e-mail: libnet-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com For additional commands, e-mail: libnet-help@securityfocus.com Received on Thu Mar 6 15:38:44 2003