Re: [RFC] Renaming libnet-1.1.1 to libnet2-1.1.1

James Ralston wrote:
> If you want to petition the authors of libnet (Mike et. al.) to kill

Actually, I don't think they need to kill the tree. They just need to rename the .h file and libraries that are installed to use the libnet2 name. (They can then safely install a config script.)

> What I *am* arguing is that the decision to rename libnet-1.1 to

I never contested that. I'm just offering a suggestion, and I contributed a patch to show clearly what I was talking about.

Since the main user of libnet-1.1 in my group has ditched it in favor of libdnet (possibly because libdnet doesn't have this unresolved issue complicating installs), I no longer care as urgently about this. I do think the maintainer probably should do the renaming I proposed.

• Dan

-- 
Dan Kegel
http://www.kegel.comhttp://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: libnet-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com
For additional commands, e-mail: libnet-help@securityfocus.com