Re: [RFC] Renaming libnet-1.1.1 to libnet2-1.1.1

James Ralston wrote:
> (Calling it "libnet2" but leaving the version at 1.1 would be very

True.

>>Since the main user of libnet-1.1 in my group has ditched it in
>>favor of libdnet (possibly because libdnet doesn't have this
>>unresolved issue complicating installs)

Because they're too young to have had to deal with it one way or another. Libnet-1.1 can't be rolled out now because it breaks things. No such problem with libdnet. - Dan

-- 
Dan Kegel
http://www.kegel.comhttp://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: libnet-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com
For additional commands, e-mail: libnet-help@securityfocus.com