Re: Packet rate limiting

there was a little typo due to cut and paste. the last "l->bt" should be "bt" and stop. anyway i attach a *stupid* test program and the new patch with this typo corrected.

anyway when you say 0 to Linux he's a bit deaf and understands 1024 ;) he seems to always want to have a buffer, even though little :( anyway Windows should not behave that way: have a look at msdn: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/winsock/winsock/tcp_ip_specific_issues_2.asp

since windows has got BSD sockets (exept that errno is augmented by ten thousands) i guess the same should be for the various BSD... Linux is a bit particular, expecially about SNDBUF... (if you search on google about Linux and SNDBUF you'll notice that it tells you the double of SNDBUF when you want to know how big it is...) cheers
sandr8)

On Sun, 13 Jul 2003 11:25:59 -0700
Aaron Turner <aturner@pobox.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 09:20:52AM +0200, alessandro salvatori wrote:

Do you need help?

In addition to our free technical library, Pantek provides professional IT services to companies who utilize Open Source software: Learn more about Pantek's Technical Support offerings Place an order for 24/7/365 Technical Support here Learn more about Pantek, who we are, and what we do Chat with a Live Operator Related securityfocus.com Links bugtraq certification focus-bsd focus-ids focus-ih focus-linux focus-ms focus-sun focus-unix-other focus-virus forensics incidents libnet linux-secnews ms-secnews pen-test secpapers secprog sectools secureshell security-basics securityjobs sf-news vuln-dev webappsec Request more information about Pantek

• application/octet-stream attachment: patch_CHOOSE_IF_YOU_WANT_BUFFERED_OUTPUT__typo_corrected_.diff

• application/octet-stream attachment: smurf_no_cq__ugly_sample_indeed_.c