|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Finding real host in Nmap -D Scans
From: Fyodor <fyodor(at)insecure.org>
Date: Tue Mar 04 2003 - 01:16:42 EST
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 11:26:38PM -0600, Kevin Hodle wrote:
Obsolete? Hardly. While many broadband and dialup providers have finally implemented some form of egress filtering, most aren't what I would consider "very strict". Usually attackers can at least spoof any IP on the same class C. My ATT cable modem can spoof a range of literally thousands of IPs. And that is all that matters for many users who are simply trying to camoflauge their exact IP. Sure, many cable modem/DSL/dialup users can't spoof entirely arbitrary IP addresses directly, but they often can do that from the first corporate/university/Korean box that they own. And those boxes likely have superior bandwidth for scanning anyway. Of course, I don't advocate compromising systems or even using decoys to hide scanning activity. I proudly perform virtually all of my Nmap scanning from my own networks, and rarely receive complaints. This is because I try to keep the scans unintrusive and targetted (not millions of machines). I also get consent first where practical.
And for those who insist on spoofed scans, at least consider the new
Nmap Idlescan technique described at
Cheers,
Are your vulnerability scans producing just another report?
Manage the entire remediation process with StillSecure VAM's
Vulnerability Repair Workflow.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:02:33 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||