Would you not have had an NDA with your client and should this not have
been covered under such an NDA? It should be up to your client to take
action on this one.
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 saraf@hushmail.com wrote:
> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 14:04:04 -0800
> From: saraf@hushmail.com
> To: pen-test@securityfocus.com
> Subject: Thankyou
>
>
> To everyone who sent me mail on my earlier topic thankyou. We are working
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
"I don't intend to offend, I offend with my intent"
hellNbak@nmrc.org
http://www.nmrc.org/~hellnbak
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
top spam and e-mail risk at the gateway.
SurfControl E-mail Filter puts the brakes on spam & viruses
and gives you the reports to prove it. See exactly how much
junk never even makes it in the door. Free 30-day trial:
http://www.surfcontrol.com/go/zsfptl1
Received on Thu Mar 27 11:57:47 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8
: Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:02:34 EDT
|