|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Vulnerability scanners
From: Alvin Oga <alvin.sec(at)Mail.Linux-Consulting.com>
Date: Thu Mar 27 2003 - 16:31:10 EST hi ya On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Jeff Williams @ Aspect wrote: > Let's assume that you're talking about 256 IPs (based on Qualys' published
their "mail server scanning" is pointless ??? ( when we tried it out )
vulnerability scanning and pen-testing ...
> effort for someone (probably more to generate a very nice report and
you do need a qualified testor ... newbies wont knwo what to look for and how to test it .. i'd say a good vulnerability scanner and pen-testor would run $150K in salaries + double it for insurance, benefits, office space, phones, lab, PCs, test archives, etc plus probably an additional knowledgeable secretary to type up pretty reports and attachements "good" == they can find the obvivious holes... in a matter of minutes - break into any pc running sendmail earlier than 8.12.8 - break into any apache w /443 left on - break into wireless sites w/ telnet/ftp/pop3 left on inside ... blah .. blah ..
c ya
top spam and e-mail risk at the gateway. SurfControl E-mail Filter puts the brakes on spam & viruses and gives you the reports to prove it. See exactly how much junk never even makes it in the door. Free 30-day trial: http://www.surfcontrol.com/go/zsfptl1 Received on Thu Mar 27 17:10:37 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:02:34 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||