|
|||||||||||
|
RE: Vulnerability scanners
From: Derrick Johnson <derrick_b_johnson(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Fri Mar 28 2003 - 11:46:26 EST
Qualys definently has Foundscan beat in terms of reporting. However Foundscan definently has Qualys beat in terms of speed. With Foundscan, you can't download the report. You have to copy and paste it into Word in order to alert the a system owner to a vulnerability - if you don't want to provide them access to the scanner. One thing I like about Qualys is that you can view individual system reports as the scan is progressing, you don't have to wait until the entire scan is done to view one system's problems. Once a system has completed, you click on it's IP and you have a report of that one system. Comes in handy for single system reports. Qualys and Foundscan definently have Nessus beat in terms of minimized false positives. So many times Nessus would report on a vulnerability only for the system owner to report that the recommended patch had already been applied, or that files Nessus was finding were nowhere to be found on the system. You can fix this in Nessus by altering the signature code, whereas you have to tell Foundstone and Qualys that a particular finding is a false postive. What they do with that info, I have no idea. Hope this helps --Derrick
Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! http://platinum.yahoo.com top spam and e-mail risk at the gateway. SurfControl E-mail Filter puts the brakes on spam & viruses and gives you the reports to prove it. See exactly how much junk never even makes it in the door. Free 30-day trial: http://www.surfcontrol.com/go/zsfptl1 Received on Fri Mar 28 15:26:15 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:02:34 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||