|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Am I missing something about portsentry?
From: R. DuFresne <dufresne(at)sysinfo.com>
Date: Thu May 22 2003 - 14:00:11 EDT It should not take a kill and restart or even a kill -HUP of portsentry, but, removing from the portsentry.blocked.X files and then deleting the route should reopen access for the target/source in question. Depending upon the OS, the dead route points the offender to 127.0.0.1, so: route -delete target-ip 127.0.0.1 should remove that also. Thanks, Ron DuFresne On Thu, 22 May 2003, Vlad G. wrote: > In the process of pentesting a machine on local network I got locked out of
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
admin & senior security consultant: sysinfo.com
http://sysinfo.com
"Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It
eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation."
-- Johnny Hart
testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Wireless LAN Policies for Security & Management - NEW White Paper ***
Just like wired networks, wireless LANs require network security policies
that are enforced to protect WLANs from known vulnerabilities and threats.
Learn to design, implement and enforce WLAN security policies to lockdown enterprise WLANs.
To get your FREE white paper visit us at:
http://www.securityfocus.com/AirDefense-pen-test
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thu May 22 14:54:01 2003This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:02:36 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||