|
|||||||||||
|
RE: Honeypot detection and countermeasures
From: Rob Shein <shoten(at)starpower.net>
Date: Tue Jun 24 2003 - 09:48:28 EDT
And yes, I'm sure there are honeypots and honeynets out there beyond what's normally thought of by most people (including me)...but the whole point I was making is that one cannot learn how to do pen-tests by watching a single one directed at a honeypot or honeynet of ANY kind. Even if you see every attack, understand it with absolute clarity, and are able to replicate it, the fact is that the attack was against something that is fundamentally different from a production network. Furthermore, the "what ifs" of alternate choices that would have been made given a different target (say, the production network) will remain unknown, and may well make all the difference in the world. Putting exceptions aside, honey*s are called "honey" for a reason; they are, as a standard, made to appear more low-hanging than most fruit on the network that hosts them, and therefore make more attractive targets. Latest attack techniques. You're a pen tester, but is google.com still your R&D team? Now you can get trustworthy commercial-grade exploits and the latest techniques from a world-class research group. Visit us at: www.coresecurity.com/promos/sf_ept1 or call 617-399-6980 Received on Tue Jun 24 11:45:23 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:02:38 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||