Hosting Provided By

RE: safe strcpy()?

From: Hall, Philip <phall(at)spss.com>
Date: Tue Jan 28 2003 - 23:00:33 EST

> Of course, the real way to build secure software is not

Hang on, that sounds akin to not having locks (safe functions) on your front door, but posting a guard (data validation) at the end of your drive way...hmmmmm I think I'll stick to my eXtreme Defensive Programming (XDP) and be paranoid about everything...unless you meant that by *adding* the data validity to the 'safe' functions to beef them up...?

--phil Received on Wed Jan 29 15:52:58 2003

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ed Carp: "RE: safe strcpy()?"
Previous message: mlh(at)zip.com.au: "Re: safe strcpy()?"
Maybe in reply to: Ed Carp: "safe strcpy()?"
In reply to Michael Howard: "RE: safe strcpy()?"
Next in thread: Daniel Reed: "RE: safe strcpy()?"
Reply: Daniel Reed: "RE: safe strcpy()?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:02:46 EDT