Mailing List Archive For secprog@securityfocus.com Nov 2002 By Date

• Wed Nov 27 2002 - 12:01:13 EST
  • Re: Source code monitoring for a large development group Stephane Nasdrovisky 
• Wed Nov 27 2002 - 00:12:12 EST
  • Re: Security Education in the Workplace K. K. Mookhey 
• Wed Nov 27 2002 - 00:01:13 EST
  • Re: Security Education in the Workplace Jeff Williams (at) Aspect 
• Tue Nov 26 2002 - 16:29:29 EST
  • Source code monitoring for a large development group Craig Minton 
• Tue Nov 26 2002 - 19:41:04 EST
  • Security Education in the Workplace Dana Epp 
• Tue Nov 26 2002 - 12:46:58 EST
  • RE: secprog Digest 18 Nov 2002 18:35:57 -0000 Issue 113 Ogle Ron (Rennes) 
• Mon Nov 25 2002 - 23:59:02 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Elliott Mitchell 
• Tue Nov 26 2002 - 10:03:24 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha 
• Mon Nov 25 2002 - 16:40:18 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Tórgan Flores de Siqueira 
• Mon Nov 25 2002 - 15:25:26 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha 
• Mon Nov 25 2002 - 16:07:09 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Glynn Clements 
• Fri Nov 22 2002 - 10:31:48 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Frank Knobbe 
• Mon Nov 25 2002 - 15:28:38 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? John Viega 
• Mon Nov 25 2002 - 08:52:54 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? Ben Laurie 
• Fri Nov 22 2002 - 19:17:07 EST
  • Re: secprog Digest 18 Nov 2002 18:35:57 -0000 Issue 113 George Capehart 
• Fri Nov 22 2002 - 12:27:53 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Ali Saifullah Khan 
• Sun Nov 24 2002 - 19:10:25 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Dullien(at)gmx.net 
• Fri Nov 22 2002 - 02:11:52 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu 
• Mon Nov 25 2002 - 05:30:14 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Dullien(at)gmx.net 
• Fri Nov 22 2002 - 10:35:58 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Tim van Erven 
• Fri Nov 22 2002 - 13:41:40 EST
  • RE: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Michael Howard 
• Sun Nov 24 2002 - 20:42:36 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Crispin Cowan 
• Thu Nov 21 2002 - 23:06:33 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Mark Curphey 
• Tue Nov 19 2002 - 12:06:25 EST
  • Security Education (was are bad developer libs....) Michael Howard 
• Tue Nov 19 2002 - 11:00:24 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha 
• Tue Nov 19 2002 - 17:57:57 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Andrew Dalgleish 
• Thu Nov 21 2002 - 11:34:11 EST
  • Re[2]: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? dullien(at)gmx.de 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 22:57:18 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Alex Lambert 
• Tue Nov 19 2002 - 18:08:45 EST
  • Delphi Edgar Fitzgerald 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 16:59:43 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? cdavison(at)nucleus.com 
• Tue Nov 19 2002 - 15:53:17 EST
  • RE: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? cc_mofo(at)hushmail.com 
• Tue Nov 19 2002 - 15:55:28 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Crispin Cowan 
• Tue Nov 19 2002 - 04:31:32 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Steffen Dettmer 
• Tue Nov 19 2002 - 16:23:41 EST
  • Re: secprog Digest 18 Nov 2002 18:35:57 -0000 Issue 113 David Wheeler 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 22:10:15 EST
  • RE: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Tom Love 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 22:45:19 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Glynn Clements 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 18:10:35 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Andrew Griffiths 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 22:25:46 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Frank Knobbe 
• Tue Nov 19 2002 - 09:24:19 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Tom Cosgrove 
• Tue Nov 19 2002 - 03:53:47 EST
  • RE: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Steven M. Christey 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 18:22:51 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Andrew Griffiths 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 16:33:45 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Alec Kosky 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 17:24:59 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? John Viega 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 15:51:03 EST
  • RE: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Michael Howard 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 14:36:33 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Casper Dik 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 13:47:32 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? John Viega 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 14:17:00 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? John Viega 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 19:27:25 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Elliott Mitchell 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 16:28:08 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? John Viega 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 15:53:41 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Dana Epp 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 12:55:31 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? cdavison(at)nucleus.com 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 13:54:04 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? John Viega 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 13:26:39 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Götz Babin-Ebell 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 16:06:51 EST
  • RE: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Michael Howard 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 13:10:39 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Kevin Spett 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 16:46:47 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Frank Knobbe 
• Sun Nov 17 2002 - 03:46:53 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Casper Dik 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 02:46:30 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? Steffen Dettmer 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 14:44:42 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? John Viega 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 12:42:06 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? cdavison(at)nucleus.com 
• Mon Nov 18 2002 - 10:37:26 EST
  • Secure Programming for Linux and Unix HOWTO David Wheeler 
• Sun Nov 17 2002 - 16:29:02 EST
  • RE: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Michael Howard 
• Sun Nov 17 2002 - 16:11:36 EST
  • RE: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Tom Love 
• Sat Nov 16 2002 - 14:03:41 EST
  • RE: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Frank Knobbe 
• Sat Nov 16 2002 - 20:46:04 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Glynn Clements 
• Sat Nov 16 2002 - 15:47:44 EST
  • RE: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Steven M. Christey 
• Sat Nov 16 2002 - 02:41:25 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Secterm . 
• Sat Nov 16 2002 - 10:46:48 EST
  • RE: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Michael Howard 
• Thu Nov 14 2002 - 19:22:38 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Ben Pfaff 
• Sat Nov 16 2002 - 10:29:57 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Alex Lambert 
• Fri Nov 15 2002 - 20:00:01 EST
  • RE: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Michael Howard 
• Fri Nov 15 2002 - 17:41:56 EST
  • RE: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Ed Carp 
• Thu Nov 14 2002 - 00:37:55 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? phani(at)myrealbox.com 
• Fri Nov 15 2002 - 11:13:50 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? dullien(at)gmx.de 
• Thu Nov 14 2002 - 06:17:18 EST
  • RE: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Smith, Eric V. 
• Thu Nov 14 2002 - 11:53:32 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? cc_mofo(at)hushmail.com 
• Thu Nov 14 2002 - 11:47:04 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Jason Lunz 
• Wed Nov 13 2002 - 22:34:19 EST
  • Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Michael Still 
• Wed Nov 13 2002 - 18:02:05 EST
  • Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Darren Reed 
• Wed Nov 13 2002 - 12:34:48 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? Sverre H. Huseby 
• Tue Nov 12 2002 - 12:11:37 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? David Wagner 
• Tue Nov 12 2002 - 08:56:44 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? Craig Minton 
• Tue Nov 12 2002 - 08:55:43 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? John Viega 
• Tue Nov 12 2002 - 06:52:56 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? Ben Laurie 
• Mon Nov 11 2002 - 23:06:17 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? John Viega 
• Mon Nov 11 2002 - 23:33:09 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu 
• Mon Nov 11 2002 - 23:00:54 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu 
• Mon Nov 11 2002 - 22:48:41 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? John Viega 
• Mon Nov 11 2002 - 22:39:08 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu 
• Mon Nov 11 2002 - 17:46:05 EST
  • Re: Undeliverable: Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? John Viega 
• Mon Nov 11 2002 - 17:34:12 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? John Viega 
• Mon Nov 11 2002 - 17:35:12 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? lists(at)notatla.demon.co.uk 
• Mon Nov 11 2002 - 16:38:01 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? John Viega 
• Mon Nov 11 2002 - 16:30:32 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? John Viega 
• Mon Nov 11 2002 - 13:36:34 EST
  • RE: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? Oscar Batyrbaev 
• Mon Nov 11 2002 - 13:36:23 EST
  • RE: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? Jonathan Wilkins 
• Mon Nov 11 2002 - 12:53:03 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? Ben Laurie 
• Mon Nov 11 2002 - 12:31:50 EST
  • RE: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? Oscar Batyrbaev 
• Mon Nov 11 2002 - 12:28:40 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? John Viega 
• Mon Nov 11 2002 - 12:03:13 EST
  • RE: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? Jeremy Epstein 
• Mon Nov 11 2002 - 11:32:35 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? David Wagner 
• Mon Nov 11 2002 - 11:52:22 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? John Viega 
• Mon Nov 11 2002 - 11:38:38 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? John Viega 
• Mon Nov 11 2002 - 09:35:09 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? John Viega 
• Mon Nov 11 2002 - 10:02:09 EST
  • RE: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? Oscar Batyrbaev 
• Sun Nov 10 2002 - 13:36:52 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? Rick Wash 
• Sun Nov 10 2002 - 11:46:51 EST
  • RE: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? Oscar Batyrbaev 
• Sat Nov 09 2002 - 22:17:59 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? David Wagner 
• Sat Nov 09 2002 - 07:17:56 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? Ben Laurie 
• Sat Nov 09 2002 - 11:54:10 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? Dana Epp 
• Sat Nov 09 2002 - 00:43:08 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu 
• Fri Nov 08 2002 - 21:31:09 EST
  • Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? John Viega 
• Tue Nov 05 2002 - 16:01:28 EST
  • SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? Craig Minton 
• Wed Nov 06 2002 - 13:58:09 EST
  • RE: Import/Export a plain text key in/out of CAPI Michael Howard 
• Wed Nov 06 2002 - 11:03:24 EST
  • Import/Export a plain text key in/out of CAPI Jason Lavigne 

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:02:47 EDT