Hosting Provided By

Mailing List Archive For secprog@securityfocus.com By messages with attachments

RE: Password Hiding Calderon, Juan C (EM, DDEMESIS) (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 11:51:56 EDT)
1. smime.p7s (3035 bytes)
Re: DES Key Decryption Time Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu (Thu Apr 10 2003 - 11:14:26 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: DES Key Decryption Time Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 14:55:15 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: DES Key Decryption Time Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 14:09:42 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
DES Key Decryption Time Ali Saifullah Khan (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 13:17:42 EDT)
1. smime.p7s (2680 bytes)
Re: Some questions on DES Encryption... Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:31:25 EST)
1. part (227 bytes)
Race-free directory removal Timo Sirainen (Sun Feb 23 2003 - 19:07:19 EST)
1. dir.c__charset_ISO-8859-15 (4086 bytes)
Re: safestr alpha (Safe C String Library) Adam H.Pendleton (Tue Feb 11 2003 - 17:39:59 EST)
1. PGP.sig (173 bytes)
Re: safestr alpha (Safe C String Library) Bennett Todd (Tue Feb 11 2003 - 15:28:44 EST)
1. part (190 bytes)
Re: safe strcpy()? Crispin Cowan (Thu Jan 30 2003 - 14:08:58 EST)
1. part (253 bytes)
Re: safe strcpy()? Crispin Cowan (Thu Jan 30 2003 - 01:19:47 EST)
1. part (253 bytes)
Re: safe strcpy()? Crispin Cowan (Tue Jan 28 2003 - 17:49:45 EST)
1. part (253 bytes)
Re: safe strcpy()? Crispin Cowan (Tue Jan 28 2003 - 02:57:37 EST)
1. part (253 bytes)
Re: malicious code Crispin Cowan (Tue Jan 28 2003 - 00:31:59 EST)
1. part (253 bytes)
Re: Standards for developing secure software Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu (Mon Jan 27 2003 - 15:25:36 EST)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: PGP scripting... Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu (Fri Jan 24 2003 - 18:45:38 EST)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: Standards for developing secure software Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu (Fri Jan 24 2003 - 18:33:26 EST)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: Can System() of Perl be bypassed? Brian Hatch (Thu Jan 23 2003 - 17:15:43 EST)
1. part (241 bytes)
Re: Standards for developing secure software Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu (Thu Jan 23 2003 - 14:52:00 EST)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: Can System() of Perl be bypassed? Brian Hatch (Thu Jan 23 2003 - 13:44:29 EST)
1. part (241 bytes)
Re: Can System() of Perl be bypassed? Brian Hatch (Wed Jan 22 2003 - 16:58:01 EST)
1. part (241 bytes)
Re: PGP scripting... Andrew MacKenzie (Wed Jan 08 2003 - 23:59:30 EST)
1. part (190 bytes)
Re: PGP scripting... Crispin Cowan (Sat Jan 11 2003 - 03:56:35 EST)
1. part (253 bytes)
Re: PGP scripting... Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu (Fri Jan 10 2003 - 14:31:54 EST)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: PGP scripting... Andrew MacKenzie (Fri Jan 10 2003 - 13:45:07 EST)
1. part (190 bytes)
Re: PGP scripting... Brian Hatch (Thu Jan 09 2003 - 10:57:19 EST)
1. part (241 bytes)
Re: PGP scripting... Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu (Wed Jan 08 2003 - 18:00:53 EST)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: PGP scripting... Andrew MacKenzie (Wed Jan 08 2003 - 14:23:21 EST)
1. part (190 bytes)
Re: PGP scripting... Andrew MacKenzie (Wed Jan 08 2003 - 14:15:40 EST)
1. part (190 bytes)
Re: PGP scripting... Andrew MacKenzie (Wed Jan 08 2003 - 14:08:10 EST)
1. part (190 bytes)
Re: PGP scripting... Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu (Tue Jan 07 2003 - 23:12:18 EST)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: PGP scripting... Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu (Tue Jan 07 2003 - 23:17:07 EST)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: PGP scripting... Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu (Wed Jan 08 2003 - 10:56:40 EST)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: PGP scripting... Frank Knobbe (Wed Jan 08 2003 - 01:47:37 EST)
1. signature.asc (188 bytes)
Re: PGP scripting... Brian Hatch (Tue Jan 07 2003 - 19:53:26 EST)
1. part (241 bytes)
Re: PGP scripting... Frank Knobbe (Tue Jan 07 2003 - 21:19:42 EST)
1. signature.asc (188 bytes)
Re: PGP scripting... Andrew MacKenzie (Tue Jan 07 2003 - 18:35:13 EST)
1. part (190 bytes)
Re: PGP scripting... Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu (Tue Jan 07 2003 - 15:19:24 EST)
1. part (227 bytes)
PGP scripting... Andrew MacKenzie (Tue Jan 07 2003 - 12:02:13 EST)
1. part (190 bytes)
Re: Writing Secure code[update] Crispin Cowan (Wed Jan 01 2003 - 23:17:57 EST)
1. part (253 bytes)
Re: Preventing ptrace() Brian Hatch (Tue Dec 31 2002 - 13:31:12 EST)
1. part (241 bytes)
Re: Writing Secure code[update] Crispin Cowan (Tue Dec 31 2002 - 15:28:22 EST)
1. part (253 bytes)
Re: Writing Secure code Crispin Cowan (Sat Dec 28 2002 - 14:04:12 EST)
1. part (253 bytes)
Re: Writing Secure code Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu (Fri Dec 27 2002 - 15:50:43 EST)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: Writing Secure code Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu (Fri Dec 27 2002 - 13:03:08 EST)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: Secure random ID generation Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu (Wed Dec 04 2002 - 01:19:01 EST)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: Secure random ID generation Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu (Tue Dec 03 2002 - 15:22:20 EST)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Frank Knobbe (Fri Nov 22 2002 - 10:31:48 EST)
1. signature.asc (308 bytes)
Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu (Fri Nov 22 2002 - 02:11:52 EST)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Crispin Cowan (Sun Nov 24 2002 - 20:42:36 EST)
1. part (253 bytes)
Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Crispin Cowan (Tue Nov 19 2002 - 15:55:28 EST)
1. part (253 bytes)
Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Frank Knobbe (Mon Nov 18 2002 - 22:25:46 EST)
1. signature.asc (308 bytes)
Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Götz Babin-Ebell (Mon Nov 18 2002 - 13:26:39 EST)
1. smime.p7s (2778 bytes)
Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Frank Knobbe (Mon Nov 18 2002 - 16:46:47 EST)
1. signature.asc (308 bytes)
RE: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software? Frank Knobbe (Sat Nov 16 2002 - 14:03:41 EST)
1. signature.asc (308 bytes)
Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu (Mon Nov 11 2002 - 23:33:09 EST)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu (Mon Nov 11 2002 - 23:00:54 EST)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu (Mon Nov 11 2002 - 22:39:08 EST)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: SHA-1 vs. triple-DES for password encryption? Valdis.Kletnieks(at)vt.edu (Sat Nov 09 2002 - 00:43:08 EST)
1. part (227 bytes)

Last message date: Wed Aug 13 2003 - 16:36:08 EDT
Archived on: Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:02:47 EDT

442 messages sort by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:02:47 EDT