|
|||||||||||
|
Re: 3DES key-length for data authentication
From: Rick Moen <rick(at)linuxmafia.com>
Date: Thu Dec 05 2002 - 15:41:10 EST Quoting Hari-Isoft (hari@isofttechindia.com): > I would like to know the key-length used for 3DES data encryption in
An old set of notes I have says single DES starts out with 64-bit keys, but it's 56-bit when you account for the parity bit. Thus the raw key-length of 3DES is 56 * 3 = 168 bit. The _effective_ length as implemented (3DES-CBC algorithm?) may be less: Maybe one of the real crypto people will comment. > Also, I am interested in the export regulations concerning openssh in USA.
Quoting from a post I made elsewhere on that subject, two years ago: ---<snip>--- The January [2000] regulations were semi-clued in an interesting manner. Quoting the revision to Export Administration Regulations published in the January 14, 2000 _Federal Register_ (Vol. 65, No. 10, page 2492): Also in section 740.13, to, in part, take into account the "open source" approach to software development, unrestricted encryption source code not subject to an express agreement for the payment of a licensing fee or royalty for commercial production or sale of any product developed using the source code can, without preview, be released from "EI" [encryption items] controls and exported and re-exported under License Exception TSU. Intellectual property protection (e.g., copyright, patent, or trademark) would not, by itself, be construed as an express agreement for the payment of a licensing fee or royalty for commercial production or sale of any product developed using the source code. To qualify, exporters must notify BXA [Bureau of Export Administration] of the Internet location (e.g., URL or Internet address) or provide a copy of the source code by the time of export. These notifications are only required for the initial export; there are no notification requirements for end-users subsequently using the source code. Notification can be made by e-mail to crypt@bxa.doc.gov . [...] This is at http://www.bxa.doc.gov/Encryption/regs.htm . Cryptographer Matt Blaze has set up a remailer alias at "exports@crypto.com". Anyone wanting to send the BXA notice under "15 CFR Part 734, as revised on January 14, 2000" is invited to use that alias, which auto-appends your text to a public archive of such posts at http://www.crypto.com/exports/, in addition to sending them to the BXA. Just for fun, I have my own alias, "nsa@linuxmafia.com", which remails to Blaze's alias. Pro bono publico. ---<snip>--- And from a note I wrote to Rolf Braun, author of Better Telnet for MacOS (whose beta supports SSH): ---<snip>--- http://www.bxa.doc.gov/Encryption/EncryptionRuleOct2K.html or http://www.bxa.doc.gov/Encryption/pdfs/EncryptionRuleOct2K.pdf has the text of the Oct. 19 regulation revision, which amends Sec. 740.13 covering the TSU (Technology and Software Unrestricted) exception to EI (encryption items) export controls. The new addition says that, if a codebase's source code meets the provisions of the TSU exception -- no fee or payment required other than resaonable and customary fees for reproduction and distribution, and crypt@bxa.doc.gov has been notified about the planned public availability -- then object code compiled from that source code may be exported under the same terms. IANAL, but I estimate as you do that your SSH-enabled BetterTelnet source code qualifies for exception BXA (given notification to the crypt e-mail address). Therefore, your binary code does likewise. Which I believe clears the last obstacle out of your way. If you give e-mail notice to BXA, I'd urge you to do so through Matt Blaze's mechanism for same. It's explained at http://www.crypto.com/exports/ . ---<snip>--- Again, I am not a lawyer, and this message is not legal advice. Businesses contemplating export of strong cryptographic code under the TSU exception to EI export controls should consult competent legal counsel. For one thing, the regulatory category that BXA considers to apply to you may depend on matters external to the nature of your code, e.g., what sort of business you are. I can't predict what these considerations might be, but a good attorney presumably could. -- Cheers, Open-source SourceForge retakes the lead: Rick Moen http://gforge.org/ Thank you, Tim Perdue. rick@linuxmafia.comReceived on Fri Dec 6 13:08:13 2002 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:02:51 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||