|
|||||||||||
|
RE: apache server plus ipfilter
From: Eric Polin <eric(at)NetWolves.com>
Date: Tue Nov 19 2002 - 10:29:31 EST
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
anant - Each one of those services is great in its own right. However, when you combine them together, it is not such a good practice. Any service that holds a LISTENING port, in my opinion should be chrooted or jailed. Apache is a great webserver in my opinion because it can be somewhat light, but can be also be very heavy depending on what you have compiled/added into the server. The problem with apache, and php, is that you have to stay on top, and up to date with the apache/php/perl/foo project. I really like apache, and use it for *almost* everyone of my webservers, but there have been many exploits to the project. I have been through some of the code, and it looks nice, but it is a very popular project, and because of this will always have exploits/hacks towards it. I also depend highly on ipf/ipnat. More than any other fw that i have used in unix/linux, i like ipf best. The rulesets are easy to understand, it is quick (if setup right), and in my opinion quite secure. So in my opinion, i would opt for using 2 boxen for your ipf/apache solution. if i can be of any help, send an email. Eric
Dear all,
We recently deployed a web server on Solaris 8(Intel), with
apache 1.3.27 and ipfilter firewall.
regards
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBPdpZdKUUXFhoQKvpEQK7/gCfVzCj3DnsJFyuFnOHYz0HmlmZ8sEAoK6E
LXnaangmNVVHUARpO5W2YMXS
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:03:23 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||