Pantek Library
Hosting Provided By
CybrHost
High Speed Hosting

RE: Router Packet Filtering and Firewalls

From: Trevor Cushen <Trevor.Cushen(at)sysnet.ie>
Date: Fri Jan 31 2003 - 13:49:22 EST


I particially agree with you Paul in that a router is there to do routing but the overhead of routing is low and the router is well able to withstand a bit of filtering too. Certainly large complicated filter rule sets will put an overhead on the router but that does not mean you shouldn't use any filtering on your router. Your router should block broadcasts going all over the place for one and certainly remote telnet to your router should be disabled. These are both filtering rules and I don't see why you shouldn't add a small few more rules to route more specifically and get the value out of your router and get extra security to boot. The logging situation is quickly solved with a central logging system for your DMZ setup.

In very many setups the router is the first line of defence and also the first piece of equipment in need of defending. Just look at the potential of GRE tunnels to realise the damage that could be done by a breached router. Netbios broadcasts leaving a router will reveal far more information then would be desired by any network admin. In this list server just recently one member has asked about heartbeat traffic showing up on his IDS. Router filter rules in my very humble oppion are needed and I certainly advise anyone who cares to listen (they are few and far between) that the router should be very secure and well hardened.

I would never consider a router a firewall alternative however.

Trevor Cushen
Sysnet Ltd

www.sysnet.ie
Tel: +353 1 2983000
Fax: +353 1 2960499

-----Original Message-----

From: Paul Stewart [mailto:pauls@nexicom.net] Sent: 30 January 2003 17:17
To: 'Geoff Shatz'; security-basics@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: Router Packet Filtering and Firewalls

In my opinion.. This is a great question..:)

The more the better is always the thought however when I configure such scenarios I prefer to have there firewall do the blocking and leave the router to do just routing (which it's best at anyways IMHO)....

Do you need help?X

This way you have one place to gather logging from and analysis. Of course I'm presuming that you are logging the denies and possibly permits against syslog or something similar...

I realize in this setup you only have one box protecting you versus potentionally two.... But I like routers to do routing and firewalls to do firewalling.... Just my two cents worth.... This also keeps loading down on the router if you have a busy link...

Opinions on this would be really good.. I'd love to hear what others are doing...:)

---

Paul Stewart
Network Solutions Specialist
Nexicom Inc.

-----Original Message-----

From: Geoff Shatz [mailto:geoff.shatz@pchelps.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:55 PM To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
Subject: Router Packet Filtering and Firewalls

I am trying to confirm my thoughts regarding the use of router packet filtering in addition to having a firewall behind the router but first a

little background...

Years ago when we first connected our firm to the Internet we did not have
a firewall but used packet filtering on the router to protect our perimeter.

Do you need more help?X

As time progressed and security became a much greater issue for everyone

in IT we moved forward an installed a firewall between our router and the
LAN. I was managing our router at that time and kept the initial packet filters in place as I figured two layers of security were better than one.

A few years ago we were forced to switch ISP's and our new ISP managed the
router they supplied to us. They supplied the router with no ACL's applied
to either interface which as I understand it with Cisco IOS creates an implicit permit for both inbound and outbound.

After contacting technical support I was told none of their customers use
packet filtering at the router level and that's what a firewall was for. I had a small battle with them but they finally relented and configured the router the way I asked them to.

We just had a second circuit installed and I had to go through the same routine with them and the end result was the same.

Am I missing something here? Is it not better to have both packet filtering applied on the router and a firewall behind it? Is there something inherently wrong with this or is this just a case of our ISP not
really giving a damn about security and on top of it being lazy? Any comments would be appreciated.

-Geoff


This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.

Can we help you?X

If you have received this message in error please notify SYSNET Ltd., at telephone no: +353-1-2983000 or postmaster@sysnet.ie


Received on Fri Jan 31 19:10:54 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:03:40 EDT


Contact Us  Legal Notices  Order Services Online 
Pantek Home  Privacy Policy  IT news  Site Map  Pantek Library