|
|||||||||||
|
RE: Router Packet Filtering and Firewalls
From: Trevor Cushen <Trevor.Cushen(at)sysnet.ie>
Date: Fri Jan 31 2003 - 13:49:22 EST
In very many setups the router is the first line of defence and also the first piece of equipment in need of defending. Just look at the potential of GRE tunnels to realise the damage that could be done by a breached router. Netbios broadcasts leaving a router will reveal far more information then would be desired by any network admin. In this list server just recently one member has asked about heartbeat traffic showing up on his IDS. Router filter rules in my very humble oppion are needed and I certainly advise anyone who cares to listen (they are few and far between) that the router should be very secure and well hardened. I would never consider a router a firewall alternative however.
Trevor Cushen
www.sysnet.ie
-----Original Message-----
In my opinion.. This is a great question..:) The more the better is always the thought however when I configure such scenarios I prefer to have there firewall do the blocking and leave the router to do just routing (which it's best at anyways IMHO).... This way you have one place to gather logging from and analysis. Of course I'm presuming that you are logging the denies and possibly permits against syslog or something similar... I realize in this setup you only have one box protecting you versus potentionally two.... But I like routers to do routing and firewalls to do firewalling.... Just my two cents worth.... This also keeps loading down on the router if you have a busy link... Opinions on this would be really good.. I'd love to hear what others are doing...:) ---
-----Original Message-----
I am trying to confirm my thoughts regarding the use of router packet filtering in addition to having a firewall behind the router but first a little background...
Years ago when we first connected our firm to the Internet we did not
have
As time progressed and security became a much greater issue for everyone
in IT we moved forward an installed a firewall between our router and
the
A few years ago we were forced to switch ISP's and our new ISP managed
the
After contacting technical support I was told none of their customers
use
We just had a second circuit installed and I had to go through the same routine with them and the end result was the same.
Am I missing something here? Is it not better to have both packet
filtering applied on the router and a firewall behind it? Is there
something inherently wrong with this or is this just a case of our ISP
not
-Geoff
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error please notify SYSNET Ltd., at telephone no: +353-1-2983000 or postmaster@sysnet.ie Received on Fri Jan 31 19:10:54 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:03:40 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||