|
|||||||||||
|
RE: Logwatch vs logsentry vs swatch vs ?
From: Benjamin Meade <ben(at)lanwest.com.au>
Date: Sun Mar 09 2003 - 21:12:08 EST Personally, I run a RH 7.3 box running apache, sendmail, and bind and a couple of other services, and use logwatch to monitor them all. I works pretty well, never had any problems with it.
Benjamin Meade
-----Original Message-----
Fred, I've managed to find a couple of versions of PortSentry and LogSentry (URLs are good as of 2003-03-07): http://www.teamjackass.com/portsentry-2.0b1.tar.gz http://www.teamjackass.com/logsentry-1.1.1.tar.gz Hope this helps. -sp
-----Original Message-----
I am looking to implement a log monitoring system on a Red Hat 7.3 box configured as a dedicated qmail server. Any suggestions? logcheck is now logsentry apparently and with the Cisco buyout, doesn't seem to be readily available and probably not supported in the near future. Whatever I use needs to be easily configurable with qmail log monitoring as well as standard system log monitoring.
Regards,
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:03:53 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||