Pantek Library
Hosting Provided By
CybrHost
High Speed Hosting

RE: Logwatch vs logsentry vs swatch vs ?

From: Benjamin Meade <ben(at)lanwest.com.au>
Date: Sun Mar 09 2003 - 21:12:08 EST

Personally, I run a RH 7.3 box running apache, sendmail, and bind and a couple of other services, and use logwatch to monitor them all. I works pretty well, never had any problems with it.

Benjamin Meade
System Administrator
LanWest Pty Ltd

-----Original Message-----

From: Stephen [mailto:bitbucket@look.ca] Sent: Saturday, 8 March 2003 12:45 PM
To: 'Fred Dirkse - OIC Group, Inc.'
Cc: security-basics@securityfocus.com
Subject: RE: Logwatch vs logsentry vs swatch vs ?

Fred,

I've managed to find a couple of versions of PortSentry and LogSentry (URLs are good as of 2003-03-07):

http://www.teamjackass.com/portsentry-2.0b1.tar.gz http://www.teamjackass.com/logsentry-1.1.1.tar.gz

Hope this helps.

Do you need help?X

-sp

-----Original Message-----

From: Fred Dirkse - OIC Group, Inc. [mailto:fred@oicgroup.net] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 1:26 PM
To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
Subject: Logwatch vs logsentry vs swatch vs ?

I am looking to implement a log monitoring system on a Red Hat 7.3 box configured as a dedicated qmail server. Any suggestions? logcheck is now logsentry apparently and with the Cisco buyout, doesn't seem to be readily available and probably not supported in the near future. Whatever I use needs to be easily configurable with qmail log monitoring as well as standard system log monitoring.

Regards,
Fred Dirkse Received on Mon Mar 10 12:26:52 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:03:53 EDT


Contact Us  Legal Notices  Order Services Online 
Pantek Home  Privacy Policy  IT news  Site Map  Pantek Library