|
|||||||||||
|
Re: 40-bit VS 128-bit Encryption
From: Adam Newhard <atnewhard(at)microstrain.com>
Date: Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:11:01 EDT It all depends on how important you feel the username and password are;) Every encryption "can" be cracked", it's just a matter of time. I'd say use 128-bit not only b/c it's stronger, but in my experiences I'd rather spend a little bit more money on hardware that'll do 128-bit w/o any notice of lag or any real performance impact. Also, think of it this way...incorporate the ignorance of many people...what kind of facial expressions are you gonna get from your bosses when you finish the project, present it to them, and one of them thinking they really know what's going on asks how many bits of encryption there are? Then when you say 40 (even though it's something really easy to change to 128...he won't understand that), think of what kind of facial expressions he'll make. In a lot of cases, you'll get some frowns. If you're producing this for someone who isn't very competent at encryption, they'll be more pleased with buzz words than anything else. In other words, if you can get 128 w/o any real performance hit...use it...not only for protection of you against people trying to break the encryption, but also for protection of you against an angry boss. if you ever get complaints from a boss that says it's too slow for them, you always have the "you told me to do it" card, but that's not always wise. adam Adam Newhard Microstrain, Inc. If vegetarians eat vegetables, watch out for humanitarians
> I am setting up a secure website and i was wondering which would be better
--Received on Sat Jun 21 13:41:58 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:04:59 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||