|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Ten least secure programs
From: Roger A. Grimes <rogerg(at)cox.net>
Date: Mon Jun 30 2003 - 18:27:18 EDT Chris, most rationale network administrators (or whatever you are) cannot generally dictate by themselves what is and isn't allowed on "your network". It's a business decision made by management after you've told them of the risks of using such-and-such a program. Nearly any program can be hacked, and nearly any program can be made secure. The key is how what is dictated by your business environment that must be used, and has to be secured regardless of its inherent vulnerabilities. You may hate MS-Outlook and MS-Internet Explorer, but if your CEO tells you have to support it, then it's best to learn how to secure vs. just saying someone can't have it. All the programs you mention below can easily be made relatively secure by following the vendor's recommended configuration settings and patches. The key is keeping up with vendor patches and deploying each of these programs in a reasonably prudent way. So, I wouldn't recommend telling any end-user they can't use such and such...it's better to tell them (or mgmt), "you should have it configured this way and use this patch mgmt tool" if you are going to use that software package. If you're not into my business advice and philosophy and you want your hard and fast list, consider looking at SANS (www.sans.org) top 10 list (or is it top 20 now). The list mentions some commonly vulnerable systems, that are frequently left unpatched and misconfigured. Also, I consider any P2P program to be high on my list as increased risk, simply because the security configuration and patching mechanisms aren't there. Good luck, Roger *Roger A. Grimes, Computer Security Consultant *CPA, MCSE (NT/2000), CNE (3/4), A+ *email: rogerg@cox.net *cell: 757-615-3355 *Author of Malicious Mobile Code: Virus Protection for Windows by O'Reilly * http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/malmobcode **************************************************************************** *************
> I'm putting together a list of what seem to be the ten least secure
--Received on Wed Jul 2 11:52:24 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:05:20 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||