|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Firewall Comparisons
From: <jamesworld(at)intelligencia.com>
Date: Mon Jun 30 2003 - 21:39:11 EDT
WatchGuard - Neat features. NOT a stable box. Not at all. I've probably rebuilt, troubleshot crashed from plain rule base changes more than any other firewall. Every OS upgrade ''seem's'' to get a bit better. 'When' it works, it does - alright. I DO NOT like that there is a separate application that is needed to operate/configure the thing (same with Checkpoint). If that machine ever dies and you just happen to NEED to get into the box to work on it (Mr Murphy) your screwed. You need to install the app on a separate machine and then patch it then you can finally work. ( I am certified on this too) Netscreen - Nice throughput, the OS is not quite 'there' yet, but it's very close. The built in authentication fir LDAP and Active Directory are nice features. [I am still a fan of authentication mechanism's outside of TACACS or RADIUS to reside on a separate device.server] - personal prference] ( I am not certified on this device yet) Whatever you chose.........monitor the logs. That is the critical point that crosses ALL firewalls.
At 14:59 6/27/2003, Joseph wrote:
Evaluating SSL VPNs' Consider NEOTERIS, chosen as leader by top analysts! The Gartner Group just put Neoteris in the top of its Magic Quadrant, while InStat has confirmed Neoteris as the leader in marketshare. Find out why, and see how you can get plug-n-play secure remote access in about an hour, with no client, server changes, or ongoing maintenance. Visit us at: http://www.neoteris.com/promos/sf-6-9.htm Received on Wed Jul 2 13:20:27 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:05:24 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||