Re: Ten least secure programs

On 2003-06-30 Chris Berry wrote:

>> From: Mitch Pirtle <mitchell.pirtle@verizon.net>
>> 7) BIND

djbdns [1] exists, though I don't know how well it works on larger scale and under heavy load.

<opinion>
It's somewhat peculiar, since Dan Bernstein seems to have some strange opinion on where files should be placed in the directory tree and how config should look like, so I prefer to continue using BIND and continue patching.
</opinion>

[1] http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html

Regards
Ansgar Wiechers

Find out why, and see how you can get plug-n-play secure remote access in about an hour, with no client, server changes, or ongoing maintenance.           

Visit us at: http://www.neoteris.com/promos/sf-6-9.htm

Do you need help?

In addition to our free technical library, Pantek provides professional IT services to companies who utilize Open Source software: Learn more about Pantek's Technical Support offerings Place an order for 24/7/365 Technical Support here Learn more about Pantek, who we are, and what we do Chat with a Live Operator Related securityfocus.com Links bugtraq certification focus-bsd focus-ids focus-ih focus-linux focus-ms focus-sun focus-unix-other focus-virus forensics incidents libnet linux-secnews ms-secnews pen-test secpapers secprog sectools secureshell security-basics securityjobs sf-news vuln-dev webappsec Request more information about Pantek