RE: Had a lot of jobs - how do I avert that negative aspect As a corporate recruiter, I would like to remind all of you that many of us
use securityfocus.com as a source for candidates when we have security
positions available. Perhaps Aaron should address these types of questions
to the career job boards (monster, careerbuilder, etc.) where they can go to
the career/resume advice section and ask the experts how to address these
issues.
These issues really have nothing to do with security. They do have to do
with integrity, ethics, truth, and career coaching.
Please realize that employers read these postings as well as security hiring
management (as you can see from the reply signatures). I believe you do
more harm than good when you air dirty laundry in the wrong forum.
Regards,
Lisa Hylas
Corporate Recruiter
Human Resources
Spherion Corporation
Making the Workplace Work Better
2050 Spectrum Blvd.
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 USA
Tel: 954-308-7730 Fax: 954-308-6066
lisahylas@spherion.com
www.spherion.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Reinders [mailto:rreinders@sympatico.ca]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 4:03 PM
To: Bob Radvanovsky
Cc: Aaron Whyte; securityjobs@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Had a lot of jobs - how do I avert that negative aspect
Hi,
what confuses me, as someone who will be looking for a job shortly, is
some of the advice given.
We are in the information system security field. People are relying on
our integrity. People assume we are there to help them and not make off
with their corporate secrets. I don't think slightly manipulating
reality is a good approach whatsoever and if people find out you'll look
really bad. It's really too bad if the truth doesn't work, but people
finding out that you lied is worse. It can easily destroy your reputation.
A short explanation and then a witty (but true) or perhaps a
confrontational response, like Paul Schmehl suggested, seem much better
in my opinion.
Adding a P.S asking interested people to contact you after claiming you
have slightly manipulated (I will not use stronger terms here) seems
kind of odd. Imagine you being a CEO who is uptight about someone coming
in and trying to break into systems and you find out the guy you hired
was slightly manipulative with his resume. What would you first reaction
be? Would it not be: what else did he omit/manipulate?
Richard Reinders
Bob Radvanovsky wrote:
>
> Here are your options that you have --
>
> P.S. If anyone wants someone who has pentest (penetration testing
> analysis) experience against US military installations, please let me
> know, and I will forward you my resume.
Received on Mon Feb 24 17:25:40 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8
: Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:07:28 EDT
|