|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Web single sign-on
From: Eric Rostetter <eric.rostetter(at)physics.utexas.edu>
Date: Mon Dec 09 2002 - 14:24:07 EST Quoting Marty <marti@videotron.ca>: > We have a big discussion going on at one of my clients as we are about
Good idea.
> 1- Should we buy an already made up single sign-on solution or build one
Or use an existing opensource solution. > We've met with the people from Tivoli and Computers associates already.
Nope. Lots out there. > 2- What if we go for a temporary in-house solution for next year and get
Then you need to make sure the in-house solution you pick, even if only meant to be temporary, is flexible and extensible.
> My concern here is the potential of risk being blamed by the auditors
I wouldn't worry about that. Either cen be secure/insecure, cheap/expensive, easy/hard to maintain, etc. No clear advantage either way without knowing your extact setup (manpower available, skill level, etc). > The number of users of the portal will grow in the ten of thousands by
Yes, but that doesn't affect the choice of in-house/opensource/commercial.
> The security of the project is taken care of by firewall, access list,
Well, I'd sure not depend on only that. Build security into everything, including the single-signon. Security through depth. > The number of different application is already up to ten and the portal
Normal. > Pre-requisites : We have to work with the fact that the environment is
Look at commerical apps and opensource apps (like Horde at www.horde.org) and see if anything meets your needs. If not, then go in-house. > Thanks!
-- Eric Rostetter The Department of Physics The University of Texas at Austin Why get even? Get odd!Received on Mon Dec 9 17:07:41 2002 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:07:37 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||