|
|||||||||||
|
Re: What to do with a vulerability?
From: Filip de Waard <dewaard(at)zen-interactive.nl>
Date: Fri Jan 17 2003 - 16:22:04 EST
Oliver,
There are many different opinions on this subject, but IMHO full disclosure is always the best option. There are many stories about bugs reported to Microsoft that weren't fixed or about white hat hackers who are treated disrespectfully by Microsoft. Personnaly I've chosen the Linux path a long while ago, so vulnerabilities in Microsoft code won't affect me. But for the avarage consumer of Windows full disclosure is the best option, because only then Microsoft will be forced to release a patch.
Some links:
You should try to find out if there are any legal risks before publishing anything! I'm not a citizen of the US, so I don't have much knowledge about US law, but I remember the Adobe incident with that unfortunate Russian hacker and one can't be to carefull. Good luck, Filip de Waard
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 20:39, Oliver Lavery wrote:
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:07:37 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||