|
|||||||||||
|
RE: Possible DOS against search engines?
From: Rob Shein <shoten(at)starpower.net>
Date: Mon Feb 03 2003 - 18:45:00 EST
>
I doubt this would make even a slight dent in things. Seeing as how webcrawlers already walk the entire internet, with its various languages, enormous expanse, and endless misspellings, I think anything you could create would end up being a drop in the bucket. >
But they don't crawl indefinitely. What do they do if they hit two sites that link to each other? They notice this, and move on. > 4. Upon adding the gathered words to the search engine's
But who would search on them? > - craft fake words so that they attack a specific hash
This would be noticed by the search engine long before it became a real problem, and it would be addressed. This is how they deal with many things, including people who try to influence their ranking using various means. > - craft fake words so that they disbalance a b-tree
It is my belief that, again, they will notice the impact on their database and quickly address the issue. What about a bit of code that states that if more then 5% of the words in a page are unique in the database, that that page is dropped? > If the above-mentioned things are feasible, then one can even
No, but I'd notice an abrupt lack of space on my web server. And the sudden oddly-named URLS in my logs. And the corresponding oddly-named pages in my site. And if I didn't notice, my hosting provider would. > Please note that the setup described differs from the
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:07:37 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||