Hosting Provided By

Re: partial analysis of vulndev-1.c

From: master of chaos - lord of mean <losTrace(at)gmx.de>
Date: Tue May 13 2003 - 19:17:51 EDT

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

actually, during debugging i used a modified version with #define SIZE 10. this one did not produce a SIGSEGV.
when realising that others were able to produce one (Nexus for example), i checked the unmodified. it produces a SIGSEGV.

does someone know, why the modified does not produce one?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+wX0jWCFHEwXrEHMRAgx0AJ9o2sXADTflZWLOkDwyUn+FueY3EgCdF5Ck RnHpQsRiuedObaBlLM50xU0=
=MI0H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tue May 13 20:10:05 2003

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: kyle(at)kylelai.com: "RE: IIS/WebDav Exploit List"
Previous message: Shafik Yaghmour: "RE: Administrivia: List Announcement"
In reply to: David R. Piegdon: "partial analysis of vulndev-1.c"
In reply to Maurizio Marini: "Re: Web single sign-on"
Next in thread: David Schwartz: "RE: partial analysis of vulndev-1.c"
Reply: David Schwartz: "RE: partial analysis of vulndev-1.c"
Reply: andrewg(at)d2.net.au: "Re: partial analysis of vulndev-1.c"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:07:39 EDT