|
|||||||||||
|
AW: AW: JRun: The Easiness of Session Fixation
From: Javor Evstatiev <Javor.Evstatiev(at)d-con.com>
Date: Sat Mar 01 2003 - 20:00:15 EST
agree on proxies. btw isnt it likely that they will send correct FORWARDED_FOR headers? do not fully agree on nat. why whould someone change his src? even if someone uses several outgoing src addrs I doubt they will round robin them, imho this would break lots of other apps (telnet? ftp? udp based games?) if you have a good solution for mitm attacks against plain http Id love to know about it.
cheers,
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Saturday 01 March 2003 02:13 pm, Javor Evstatiev wrote:
What about MITM? NAT? Most AOL traffic comes from something like 6 IPs. And you're going to rely on that to determine whether or not a session is valid? You'll do much better with a session mechanism that isn't simply brain-dead.
iD8DBQE+X+keoV0dQ6uSmkYRAglXAKCVhfzS2/hikb+V51M8QASef7U7YACg1uhi
UuPBKqaXVf0tFcpbhuXn7tU=
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:07:49 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||