Pantek Library
Hosting Provided By
CybrHost
High Speed Hosting

RE: Web Application Source Vulnerability Scanners

From: Brass, Phil (ISS Atlanta) <PBrass(at)iss.net>
Date: Tue Mar 04 2003 - 14:48:54 EST


When you say most, I'm guessing you're excluding at least Spike Proxy, see below:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ory Segal [mailto:ory.segal@sanctuminc.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 10:25 AM
> To: webappsec@securityfocus.com
> Subject: RE: Web Application Source Vulnerability Scanners
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The problem with most open source tools is that they are very

It's in there, though not as comprehensive as the commercial tools.

> 2) Automatic testing validation.

Not sure what this means?

> 3) Good reporting abilities

I don't think it has any reporting capabilities at all?

> 4) Session management/Transient management - Keeping the scanner 'in
> session'. This gives you the ability to scan web applications
> that force
> you to login, and may kick you out of session, if you caused
> some error
> - I believe that most large web apps have this. I believe
> that AppScan
> is the only scanner to perform this action.

Do you need help?X

Since it's mainly a proxy, your browser keeps it in session. For the static CGI checks it probably does not stay "in-session" with cookies, but I suspect that might not be too hard, at least for static session identifiers.

> 5) Good performance

Kinda hard to quantify. I would say Spike proxy has average performance for most tests - they are performed one-at-a-time rather than in parallel, like the current generation of many other tools.

> 6) Contstant updates.

There was a while there where you couldn't go two days without seeing another annoying announcement from Dave about the latest update to Spike proxy.

> 7) Logging of raw HTTP traffic

It's in there.

> 8) The ability to easily implement new tests.

Do you need more help?X

VulnXML support for implementing your own checks in a standards-compliant fashion.

Plus, fully open-source, so you can fix bugs if they annoy you enough.

Not as polished or comprehensive as commercial scanners, but it's free and it *is* application-level, and it *does* have tests for buffer-overflows and SQL injection and the like.

Phil Received on Tue Mar 4 15:16:52 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:07:49 EDT


Contact Us  Legal Notices  Order Services Online 
Pantek Home  Privacy Policy  IT news  Site Map  Pantek Library