|
|||||||||||
|
RE: Web Application Source Vulnerability Scanners
From: Brass, Phil (ISS Atlanta) <PBrass(at)iss.net>
Date: Tue Mar 04 2003 - 14:48:54 EST
> -----Original Message-----
It's in there, though not as comprehensive as the commercial tools.
> 2) Automatic testing validation.
I don't think it has any reporting capabilities at all? > 4) Session management/Transient management - Keeping the scanner 'in
Since it's mainly a proxy, your browser keeps it in session. For the static CGI checks it probably does not stay "in-session" with cookies, but I suspect that might not be too hard, at least for static session identifiers.
> 5) Good performance
Kinda hard to quantify. I would say Spike proxy has average performance for most tests - they are performed one-at-a-time rather than in parallel, like the current generation of many other tools.
> 6) Contstant updates.
There was a while there where you couldn't go two days without seeing another annoying announcement from Dave about the latest update to Spike proxy. > 7) Logging of raw HTTP traffic
It's in there.
> 8) The ability to easily implement new tests.
VulnXML support for implementing your own checks in a standards-compliant fashion. Plus, fully open-source, so you can fix bugs if they annoy you enough. Not as polished or comprehensive as commercial scanners, but it's free and it *is* application-level, and it *does* have tests for buffer-overflows and SQL injection and the like. Phil Received on Tue Mar 4 15:16:52 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:07:49 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||