|
|||||||||||
|
[Snort-devel] benchmarking snort
From: Nathan Tuck <ntuck1(at)san.rr.com>
Date: Sun May 11 2003 - 18:12:15 EDT
My question is this. If I make changes to the pattern matching engine and am interested in determining whether I have increased or decreased performance, what is the recommended way of going about measuring that? I've tried dumping sneeze output to a file and also using defcon traces. However, it appears to me that snort performance in these two cases is really bottlenecked by my disk bandwidth, and logging output. Thus far I have been benching snort with -b -A fast, but as I mentioned, it still seems like most of the time spent is non pattern-matching overhead. Any other flags I should turn on? What do other list members use for benchmarking pattern matching in snort? Any advice accepted. Thanks, nate PS - Does anyone know why sneeze gets caught in an infinite loop on quite a number of the rules files? Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com Snort-devel mailing list Snort-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-devel Received on Sun May 11 18:04:37 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:08:05 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||