|
|||||||||||
|
[Snort-sigs] Snort 1.9 "within:" option broken? (fwd)
From: Carl Gibbons <cgibbons(at)du.edu>
Date: Fri Feb 14 2003 - 10:52:29 EST
Is the "within" option in Snort 1.9 sigatures working properly? For example, in this rule in imap.rules: alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET 143 (msg:"IMAP authenticate overflow at tempt"; flow:established,to_server; content:" AUTHENTICATE "; nocase; content:!"|0a|"; within:1024; reference:nessus,10292; reference:cve,CVE-1999-0042; classtype:misc-attack; sid:1844; rev:4;)
I read the options
Nevertheless, this rule just alerted on a packet with the following payload: 32 20 61 75 74 68 65 6E 74 69 63 61 74 65 20 70 2 authenticate p 6C 61 69 6E 0D 0A lain.. Maybe I'm reading the option wrong, and it really gets parsed as "match if anything other than a newline appears in the first 1024 bytes of payload." If so, the signature, and all overflow signatures in imap.rules, yield too many false positives to be useful.
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs Received on Fri Feb 14 11:29:18 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:08:24 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||