|
|||||||||||
|
Re: [Snort-sigs] DNS poisoning
From: Matt Kettler <mkettler(at)evi-inc.com>
Date: Tue May 27 2003 - 14:40:44 EDT
What distinguishes poisoning from normal traffic is large numbers of the same reply with different IDs in them, most of which do not match the ID of the query. Since to be successful at DNS poisoning involves generating a "flood" of DNS responses directed at the querying DNS server, you can detect it using something like portscan1. Just look very large numbers of packets within 1 second.. 100 might make a good threshold. The only drawback is if your resolving DNS server is very busy you might get some false alarms, but it is unlikely.
At 11:00 AM 5/27/2003 -0500, Vincent Vono wrote:
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs Received on Tue May 27 15:47:32 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:08:29 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||