|
|||||||||||
|
RE: [Snort-sigs] A question about comparing IDSs
From: Yaakov Yehudi <yehudi(at)tehila.gov.il>
Date: Tue Mar 16 2004 - 07:24:55 EST
The question is a good one, but an answer is not so easy. The main thing affecting response time will be the speed of the various hardware components, and this will vary from computer to computer. To get a useful answer, you would have to run each IDS on identical hardware. Also the data on the network would ideally be exactly the same for each IDS's test. And it would only be fair to ensure that the data would trigger the same number of responses in each IDS. To the best of my knowledge, there has never been a test of IDS's like this.
Best Regards, Yaakov
Dear all, I am Islam Hegazy, a researcher in the faculty of Computer and Information Sciences, Ain Shams University, Egypt. I am interested in IDSs. I have developed an IDS that can detect DoS attacks, Ping sweep attacks, and secure documents thefts. I need to compare my results with other IDSs. I searched the commercial products sites, like Cisco, Sans, RealSecure. Snort, but they don't provide their experimental results. I also searched Network security magazine, IEEE, ACM but all the papers that I got talked about designs or frameworks but they don't publish any experimental results. I wonder if anyone can guide me to the right direction to find experimental results talking about the detection time or response time of various IDSs so that I can finish my work. I hope that it is clearer this time.
Thanks
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs Received on Tue Mar 16 08:32:44 2004 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:08:37 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||