|
|||||||||||
|
Re: [Snort-users] Snort's Blocking Capability?
From: Jason Haar <Jason.Haar(at)trimble.co.nz>
Date: Sun Mar 30 2003 - 05:13:16 EST Erek Adams wrote: >> * Could a setup on the hacker's machine not simply ignore
But as you say - inline is the only real way of handling this reliably. Also note that "blocking" IDS can *really* sting you. I'm still smarting from two years ago when I allowed Snort to RSET CodeReds - totally killed one of our internal groups from uploading a particular PDF file to our DMZ. Apparently the CodeRed sig just happended to appear about 800K into the file :-) "I don't get it, the upload keeps failing at the same point..." Be VERY careful with that sort of stuff. Virus-scanners have basically solved the FP problem due to recursive analysis and all sorts of double-checking - none of that is practical in an online IDS on 100M+ ethernet... Jason This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users Received on Sun Mar 30 05:42:23 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 11:50:31 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||