Re: [Snort-users] $HOME_NET

1. OK, let me get it straight. If my $HOME_NET is set to 192.168.199.0/24 and my nessus scanner is 192.168.199.20. When I scan the segment from nessus box I don't scan for ports at all, I scan only for vulnerabilities.Shouldn't the rules be triggered in this case?
2. When I scan 192.168.199.0 from the nessus box, and DO USE PORTSCAN, whould it be correct to say that IN THIS CASE NO ALERTS WILL BE GENERATED BY THE RULES, but some will be generated by pre-processors. Is that correct? Thanks a lot.

Erek Adams wrote:

>On Sun, 6 Apr 2003, Keg wrote:

-- 
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. 
Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! 
http://shopnow.netscape.com/




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: 
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! 
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users