Suhas Ingale schrieb:
> Any custom rules to catch this?
>
>
without headers i cant tell but i had the same spam, so here is my report:
- 4.4 HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2 Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (IP addr
- 2)
- 0.0 FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D Helo is d-d-d-d
- 2.0 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
- [Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?86.124.176.33>]
- 3.0 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
- [86.124.176.33 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
- 0.0 BOTNET_BADDNS Relay doesn't have full circle DNS
- [botnet_baddns,ip=86.124.176.33,rdns=86-124-176-033.iasi.fiberlink.ro]
- 5.0 BOTNET Relay might be a spambot or virusbot
- [botnet0.7,ip=86.124.176.33,hostname=86-124-176-033.iasi.fiberlink.ro,baddns,client,ipinhostname]
- 0.0 DKIM_POLICY_SIGNSOME Domain Keys Identified Mail: policy says domain
- signs some mails
- 0.0 BOTNET_IPINHOSTNAME Hostname contains its own IP address
- [botnet_ipinhosntame,ip=86.124.176.33,rdns=86-124-176-033.iasi.fiberlink.ro]
- 0.0 BOTNET_CLIENT Relay has a client-like hostname
- [botnet_client,ip=86.124.176.33,hostname=86-124-176-033.iasi.fiberlink.ro,ipinhostname]
- 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
- [score: 0.5000]
- 0.1 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to trusted network by host with
- dynamic-looking rDNS
arni
Received on Thu Jun 21 16:24:23 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8
: Thu Jun 21 2007 - 16:30:02 EDT
|