Pantek Library
Hosting Provided By
CybrHost
High Speed Hosting

Re: Spam PDF

From: <bgodette(at)idcomm.com>
Date: Fri Jun 29 2007 - 18:44:57 EDT


> It had nothing in the body. Without seeing that relay before, both
> BAYES_80 and UNIQUE_WORDS caught it.
>
> Excluding the attachment encoding itself, here's what it had:
>
> Received: from [83.76.165.174] (HELO lmnht)
> by mail.rudd.cc (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.4 _community_)
> with SMTP id 1081873 for john@rudd.cc; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 05:11:47 -0700
> Received-SPF: none
> receiver=mail.rudd.cc; client-ip=83.76.165.174;
> envelope-from=wzou@kennethhemmerick.com
> Received: from [33.31.118.54] (helo=iyaty)
> by lmnht with smtp (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD))
> id 1I4j0S-0003Q8-5s; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:12:06 +0200
> Message-ID: <468253E7.2060801@kennethhemmerick.com>
> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:11:19 +0200
> From: Annabel Cleveland <wzou@kennethhemmerick.com>
> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> To: john@rudd.cc
> Subject: Re: Cheque.22.pdf
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
> boundary="------------040808030703010202050005"
>
> --------------040808030703010202050005
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>
>
> --------------040808030703010202050005
> Content-Type: application/pdf;
> name="Cheque.22.pdf"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
> Content-Disposition: inline;
> filename="Cheque.22.pdf"
>
> [attachment data omitted]
> --------------040808030703010202050005--
>

I'm going to guess that UNIQUE_WORDS hit on the MIME definitions (the ratio is pretty bad actually as there's only 4? non-unique). As for BAYES, the score it would assign would depend entirely on how much ham with attachments (for all the common MIME stuff) and ham with PDF attachments (for the content-type) is trained vs spam of the same.

In our case it could be a lot, yours I don't know about obviously. If I were to set up per-user BAYES for my accounts I'm sure BAYES would work perfectly at catching this stuff as I don't receive any ham with PDF attachments except once or twice a year, and it'd be working mostly off the content-type. Received on Fri Jun 29 18:45:59 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 29 2007 - 18:50:03 EDT


Contact Us  Legal Notices  Order Services Online 
Pantek Home  Privacy Policy  IT news  Site Map  Pantek Library