Re: URIBL_BLACK matching on messages with no URLs in them...

At 12:07 30-06-2007, Jo Rhett wrote:
>Note: yes, uribl has their own mailing list. That server has been
>down for quite some time, so I gave up and posted it here in case
>someone is dual listed and can fix it.
>
>There's no URL in this message. What is it mis-matching against?

There was a URL in the message. It's not listed in URIBL.

Regards,
-sm Received on Sat Jun 30 22:45:37 2007