Re: A different approach to scoring spamassassin hits

On 7/2/2007, "Nix" <nix@esperi.org.uk> wrote:

>If you wanted to replace all other scoring mechanisms with the Bayes DB,
>you'd need a second Bayes DB for this, anyway, or you'd need the tokens
>corresponding to typically negative-scoring rules to have values which
>cannot appear in the body of an email. Anything else would enable spammers
>to force both FPs and FNs by customizing spam appropriately to include
>suitable NO_FOO/YES_FOO values.

That's why the data is being passed in as a second reference, nothing to do with the message. Seems to be working well, but there's some optimization to include. Received on Thu Jul 5 15:10:46 2007